How to run a code analysis from Maven or an IDE
In part two of this blog series on code analysis, I showed you how to do a proof of concept quickly using a SonarQube Docker image, and run the analysis from SonarQube Scanner. In this third and final post, we will see two SonarQube alternatives: Maven and an IDE.
Running the Analysis with Maven
To begin with this process, the first thing you must do is add the SonarQube plugin to your Maven project as follows:
(This is for Maven 2, for Maven 3 check here).
At this point you have everything necessary to perform your code analysis from Maven, so it will perform the analysis in the SonarQube server that you have already installed in a Docker container (explained here).
Then, all that remains is to go to the directory of your project and execute the Maven goal with the following command:
mvn sonar:sonar -Dsonar.host.url=http://docker-ip:port
The name of the project in SonarQube and the version is taken from the Maven project (at the beginning of the pom file). See the documentation about the parameters here.
As a result, you will see something like this:
In this way, you’ll obtain your SonarQube-generated report:
Running the Analysis in an IDE
This other method will allow you to execute the analysis directly from the IDE of your preference. Particularly here we will show you the use of the SonarLint plugin for IntelliJ, but it’s equivalent for other development environments such as Eclipse or Visual Studio.
SonarLint in IntelliJ
The first thing is to download the SonarLint plugin from the IntelliJ plugin manager. Once installed, proceed with the configuration.
Select “Enable binding to remote SonarQube server” and then select “Configure servers”.
Then add a server, entering the IP and the port of the server:
Select authentication through username and password, entering the corresponding credentials. After advancing in the wizard, choose some of the existing projects in the SonarQube server to link it.
At this time you can proceed to analyze the project you want:
Obtaining a result as shown below:
After executing the analysis, you can go to your code and SonarLint will mark the errors or possible corrections to be made as if it were a syntax error marked by the IDE itself.
What a surprise it is to see all the failures that SonarQube reports, no!? You can learn a lot by incorporating this tool early in a project. What do you think?
Recommended for You
Code Analysis Part 1: What You Should Know About Technical Debt
Code Analysis Part 2: Analyzing Code with SonarQube
Matias Fornara
Related Posts
How to Implement Load Test Scenarios in Gatling
Let’s take a look at two ways to set up load test scenarios in Gatling As we discussed in our review of Gatling, Gatling allows us to define a wide variety of performance tests. Regarding load tests, we can implement them in any of the…
Abstracta Turns 12!
Federico shares his reflections on what Abstracta means to him and all of us Today Abstracta celebrates 12 years, (a fitting topic to mark our 200th blog post)! That is, 12 years since the moment in which Matias Reina, Fabian Baptista and I took a…
2 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Search
Contents
Hi Michiel, thanks for your comment, that is a great article, I love the idea of setting thresholds that gives freedom to the developers at the same time that you improve quality. I really appreciate your contribution. Best, Matias.
hi Matias, Please check out BetterCodeHub when looking for alternatives! We take a different approach to Code Quality. Our key insight was that we needed to raise the level of abstraction from individual code quality violations, that are observed in particular code locations, to quality profiles that characterise an entire code base or a significant portion thereof. https://medium.com/softwareimprovementgroup/constraints-that-drive-creativity-6645377ca3c Best Regards Michiel